1 |
Duncan wrote: [Fri Jan 06 2006, 09:15:42AM CST] |
2 |
> Tell me, from someone who obviously has some FBSD experience, what |
3 |
> advantages does Gentoo/FreeBSD have over the normal FreeBSD? Why would |
4 |
> someone use it who is currently using regular FreeBSD, and why are you |
5 |
> spending the time? There are obviously reasons, as you're a very |
6 |
> talented person spending quite a bit of time on the project, but equally |
7 |
> obviously, I'm not familiar enough with them to make a good G/FBSD |
8 |
> representative, at this point. |
9 |
|
10 |
Most of the things that people like about Gentoo have little to do with |
11 |
the underlying C library, kernel, and userland. Instead, it's portage, |
12 |
sane configuration files, and dependency-based start-up scripts that |
13 |
tend to attract people, and as such it's not surprising that people |
14 |
would like to have all of that on a nominally *BSD-based system (for |
15 |
those people who actually do care about the underlying C library, |
16 |
kernel, and userland). |
17 |
|
18 |
That's the practical reason. A slightly more idealistic reason is that |
19 |
part of the Gentoo philosophy is that packages should work as portably |
20 |
as possible, and we should be a member-in-good-standing of the |
21 |
community. The native *BSD teams have been known to patch their ports |
22 |
to work on their systems without sending their patches upstream. We |
23 |
have a single portage tree that handles packages for all archs (and |
24 |
OSs), and our Alt teams work hard to generate patches that are (a) |
25 |
applied independent of arch/os/whatever and (b) sent upstream. Consequently, |
26 |
work on non-Linux actually does a fair bit to improve the entire |
27 |
community. |
28 |
|
29 |
-g2boojum- |
30 |
-- |
31 |
Grant Goodyear |
32 |
Gentoo Developer |
33 |
g2boojum@g.o |
34 |
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum |
35 |
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76 |