1 |
On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 02:02 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: |
2 |
> On Monday 23 May 2005 18:12, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: |
3 |
> > This can't be done everytime, and hoping for, in future, having an |
4 |
> > universal eject (libcdio should allow that) I wanted to ask if is possible |
5 |
> > to add a virtual/eject provided by sys-apps/eject and sys-apps/eject-bsd so |
6 |
> > that they can be made dependencies as needed. |
7 |
|
8 |
> News about this? We really need a solution to this. |
9 |
|
10 |
I'm just curious, but why exactly is a virtual needed? |
11 |
|
12 |
Why can't it be something like: |
13 |
|
14 |
!blah? ( sys-apps/eject ) |
15 |
blah? (sys-apps/eject-bsd ) |
16 |
|
17 |
A virtual is usually reserved for when it affects a large number of |
18 |
packages. If it affects one or two, then simply using some fun *DEPEND |
19 |
syntax usually covers the issue. |
20 |
|
21 |
-- |
22 |
Chris Gianelloni |
23 |
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager |
24 |
Games - Developer |
25 |
Gentoo Linux |