| 1 |
On Fri, 20 May 2016 12:15:36 -0400 |
| 2 |
Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On 05/20/2016 11:44 AM, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > I'd make '@' signify group names, like we do for sets. This would have |
| 7 |
> > the side limitation that it would make it impossible to filter |
| 8 |
> > filenames starting with '@' with the currently supported |
| 9 |
> > path-or-filename syntax. |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> That may be the best we can do, but in that case it's only fair to |
| 13 |
> mention the exception in the GLEP. I know you don't want implementation |
| 14 |
> details in there, but if *nobody* can come up with an implementation |
| 15 |
> that doesn't invalidate some well-defined paths, then we should |
| 16 |
> weasel-word the spec so that we don't wind up with zero fully-compliant |
| 17 |
> package managers =) |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
That's not a case since GLEP doesn't define how it is configured. |
| 20 |
And it's invalid to reference other groups in path=s of a defined |
| 21 |
group. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Best regards, |
| 26 |
Michał Górny |
| 27 |
<http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/> |
Archives