| 1 |
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 17:40:23 +0000 Ian Leitch <port001@g.o> |
| 2 |
wrote: |
| 3 |
| 1) The revision has to go through one of 2 GLEP editors, what's wrong |
| 4 |
| with letting a dev do this themselves. I agree with genone on letting |
| 5 |
| devs have CVS access. Pkus it's not obvious on the GLEP main page |
| 6 |
| which GLEPs have been updated and require votes. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
So you Cc: glep@g.o whenever you send an update to -dev. Big deal. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
| 2) Voting is done on -dev, I can't think of a worse place to conduct a |
| 11 |
| vote. We need a web interface to count and clearly display votes for |
| 12 |
| each revision. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Uh, no. Voting is done at the manager meeting. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Incidentally, at least half the people voting on your GLEP won't have |
| 17 |
read it, but that's an entirely different issue. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Fluxbox, shell tools) |
| 21 |
Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org |
| 22 |
Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm |
Archives