| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 5 |
| You just described the current process. |
| 6 |
| |
| 7 |
| A GLEP can be modified and have the revision voted on as it stands. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Yes, but: |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
1) The revision has to go through one of 2 GLEP editors, what's wrong |
| 12 |
with letting a dev do this themselves. I agree with genone on letting |
| 13 |
devs have CVS access. Pkus it's not obvious on the GLEP main page which |
| 14 |
GLEPs have been updated and require votes. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
2) Voting is done on -dev, I can't think of a worse place to conduct a |
| 17 |
vote. We need a web interface to count and clearly display votes for |
| 18 |
each revision. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Regards, |
| 21 |
Ian Leitch |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 24 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
iD8DBQFCMdgHefZ4eWAXRGIRAoN3AJ0V4QuQEoXvf7jPhgQcgIVSv4qMwQCggfP4 |
| 27 |
w1pt2X5pevf2SkbHaBoz154= |
| 28 |
=DdBJ |
| 29 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives