Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@××××××××××××.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP system worthwhile?
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 17:01:53
Message-Id: 1110560759.21812.113.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP system worthwhile? by Ian Leitch
1 On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 16:09 +0000, Ian Leitch wrote:
2 > | 'Any' state is asking for trouble. You can post non-finished GLEP plans
3 > | to the list in any state, but I'd expect things making it onto the site
4 > | to be at least in reasonable draft state.
5 >
6 > OK, that's fair enough, but just so long as the author can post a
7 > revised version and have devs vote on it again. The main reason for this
8 > is that it's hard to track changes made to a GLEP in a massive long -dev
9 > thread.
10
11 You just described the current process.
12
13 A GLEP can be modified and have the revision voted on as it stands.
14
15 --
16 Chris Gianelloni
17 Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager
18 Games - Developer
19 Gentoo Linux

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP system worthwhile? Ian Leitch <port001@g.o>