| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 5 |
| | I propose that a dev is free to upload a GLEP in any state of |
| 6 |
| | completeness/correctness as they wish, devs can then vote on said |
| 7 |
| | GLEP. If the GLEP author makes changes, devs then vote again on that |
| 8 |
| | revision. This system also gives power back to the devs (and users if |
| 9 |
| | they're allowed to vote) and away from the GLEP editors. |
| 10 |
| |
| 11 |
| 'Any' state is asking for trouble. You can post non-finished GLEP plans |
| 12 |
| to the list in any state, but I'd expect things making it onto the site |
| 13 |
| to be at least in reasonable draft state. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
OK, that's fair enough, but just so long as the author can post a |
| 16 |
revised version and have devs vote on it again. The main reason for this |
| 17 |
is that it's hard to track changes made to a GLEP in a massive long -dev |
| 18 |
thread. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Regards, |
| 21 |
Ian Leitch |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 24 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
iD8DBQFCMcLVefZ4eWAXRGIRAlXHAJ9nVGcarUlJoEUjb57N3T9ZzDqWdwCfexRK |
| 27 |
fY/QdqTl/GbAbwFOOhT9iY4= |
| 28 |
=sz/5 |
| 29 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives