1 |
On 10/11/2011 09:13 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
2 |
> On 11-10-2011 21:01:40 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
3 |
>> On 10/11/2011 08:05 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
4 |
>>> On 11-10-2011 19:59:13 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
5 |
>>>> So I've missed one ${EPREFIX} for docdir= ? How about just fixing that, |
6 |
>>>> and not crapping all over the package? |
7 |
>>> |
8 |
>>> How about first asking the maintainer before you completely rewrite an |
9 |
>>> ebuild? I'm not innocent on this topic either (ask Diego for example), |
10 |
>>> and I do allow you to make a lot of changes to my packages. Just don't |
11 |
>>> force your style and preferences on me. |
12 |
>> |
13 |
>> So basically you are saying you reverted tehnically correct changes for |
14 |
>> cosmetics. What ticked you off, the \ lines changes? I believe that was |
15 |
>> the only change that wasn't about fixing something broken. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> No, you broke the package for Prefix. Next you bumped it to EAPI=4, |
18 |
> then you removed SRC_URI for no particular reason, dropped libtool files |
19 |
> and dropped static archives. Next to this you did some reordering and |
20 |
> other cosmetic changes. |
21 |
> |
22 |
>> And so have you, changed dozens of my ebuilds for PREFIX compability or |
23 |
>> other random fixes, not everything turned out correct, mistakes were |
24 |
>> made and were clearly accidental. I've fixed them instead of wasting |
25 |
>> both of our times. Is it too much to ask for same in return? |
26 |
> |
27 |
> I already told you that you can change quite a lot to my ebuilds, |
28 |
> without me complaining. Do you mind me reverting your stuff and redoing |
29 |
> it now? |
30 |
> |
31 |
> |
32 |
|
33 |
Thanks, the end result of installed files look now OK. Care to reopen |
34 |
the stabilization bug? The changes are trivial. |
35 |
|
36 |
I just hope nobody will take an example of the ebuild with code |
37 |
duplication (multiple epatch calls), overquoting, redudant use of find |
38 |
when rm is more than enough, ... |