| 1 |
Are there anywhere more informations about OpenPAM? Because I read |
| 2 |
several threads about problems with Udev and PAM's console.perms. There |
| 3 |
are a few threads which suggest deinstalling PAM under Gentoo. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Is console.perms still used within openPAM? |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
greetings |
| 8 |
fabian |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Gregorio Guidi wrote: |
| 11 |
> On Wednesday 30 March 2005 22:15, Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò wrote: |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
>>Ok, second part of my odyssey in PAM implementations. |
| 14 |
>>After a day searching for example config files and so on, I found out that |
| 15 |
>>Linux-PAM already support the include syntax of openpam since version 0.78. |
| 16 |
>>This is useful to our needs, because it allow us to have a single |
| 17 |
>>configuration file which works on both openpam and linux-pam. |
| 18 |
>>... |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> You may be interested in this bug: |
| 22 |
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77093 |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> -- |
| 25 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
Musik ist niemals illegal: www.fairsharing.de |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
I prefer signed/encrypted Mail: |
| 34 |
Fingerprint: CFE8 38A7 0BC4 3CB0 E454 FA8D 04F9 B3B6 E02D 25BA |
Archives