Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Alec Warner <antarus@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Rationalizing USE flags by narrowing the scope of them.
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2022 00:52:38
Message-Id: CAAr7Pr-Bjw6N6yC+2m+232WMnz6z8o4gH8MGeL_PZdmYLPtU4g@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Rationalizing USE flags by narrowing the scope of them. by Michael Orlitzky
1 On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 4:29 PM Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o> wrote:
2 >
3 > On Mon, 2022-01-03 at 21:29 +0100, Piotr Karbowski wrote:
4 > >
5 > > Perhaps the 'pam' example was extreme, but ipv6, or threads as Sam
6 > > shared, does not make sense to be togglable.
7 > >
8 >
9 > Many packages need their ipv6 code disabled if the kernel has no ipv6
10 > support, and enabling ipv6 in the kernel is a pointless security risk
11 > for pretty much anyone in the United States.
12
13 https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html#tab=per-country-ipv6-adoption
14
15 Go troll somewhere else?
16
17 -A
18
19 >
20 >
21 >

Replies