1 |
I know of this problem. |
2 |
The thing that amazes me is that i very rarely find a bug report for the |
3 |
ebuild that doesn't work for me. I usaually commit the bugs i find but |
4 |
now it seems clear that some people does'nt do so. |
5 |
I thing it could be a good idea at this point to introduce an automatic |
6 |
(user indipendent) bug report in portage, so that if ebuild compiling |
7 |
fails or some other errors arise, portage automagically submit a bug to |
8 |
the bug dabatabase of gentoo. That should speed up bugfixing (at lease |
9 |
for the majors bugs that prevent even building) and should' nt be that |
10 |
hard to implement in portage. |
11 |
Bye |
12 |
|
13 |
Stefano Peluchetti |
14 |
|
15 |
P.S. sorry 4 the bad english |
16 |
|
17 |
|
18 |
Christian Bartl wrote: |
19 |
> I don't think that it would be such a good idea. |
20 |
> I can only speak for myself: As I love Gentoo, but don't have the time |
21 |
> to test |
22 |
> known unstable software I'm sure I would be the first user who never |
23 |
> touches |
24 |
> the unstable branch. I think Gentoo would get the same problems like |
25 |
> GNU/Linux |
26 |
> or Debian: Everyone waits for it getting officially stable and testing |
27 |
> is has |
28 |
> to be done by a few freaks. |
29 |
> Whoever needs a stable Gentoo now only has to read the mailing-lists an |
30 |
> knows |
31 |
> about common problems. |
32 |
> So you great developers: if you want to get you ports tested by many people |
33 |
> don't tell the community (and me :-) that it isn't stable. |
34 |
> |
35 |
> best regards |
36 |
> Christian |
37 |
> |
38 |
> At 22:06 23.07.2002 +0200, you wrote: |
39 |
> |
40 |
>> I think it should really be a very good idea to create two different |
41 |
>> branches of the gentoo distribution. A stable and a unstalbe (or |
42 |
>> testing) one. This becouse i usually find that some e-build simpy does |
43 |
>> not compile. I know that it is a relly difficult task to get all the |
44 |
>> e-build working right, but i also think that some people (like me) |
45 |
>> should prefer to work with a little outdated packages that have been |
46 |
>> tested for some time, instead of having to work with cutting edge |
47 |
>> packages that doesn't compile. Don't get me wrong. I belive that |
48 |
>> gentoo is the best linux distro i have ever seen, but this should |
49 |
>> really be an important way to go. |
50 |
>> It also should be really easy to implement thanks to the possibility |
51 |
>> to select different profiles. |
52 |
>> So let me know what you think about this. |
53 |
>> Thanks |
54 |
>> |
55 |
>> Stefano Peluchetti |
56 |
>> |
57 |
>> _______________________________________________ |
58 |
>> gentoo-dev mailing list |
59 |
>> gentoo-dev@g.o |
60 |
>> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
61 |
>> |
62 |
> |
63 |
> _______________________________________________ |
64 |
> gentoo-dev mailing list |
65 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o |
66 |
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
67 |
> |