Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Georgi Georgiev <chutz@×××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Interest Check: Dynamic config files for portage
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2003 11:28:21
Message-Id: 20030701112817.GB27934%chutz@gg3.net
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Interest Check: Dynamic config files for portage by Seemant Kulleen
1 On 01/07/2003 at 02:58:24(-0700), Seemant Kulleen used 1.8K just to say:
2 > The idea stems from the fact that etc-updating a make.conf file can be a bit
3 > of a stressful event.
4
5 I used to feel the same way. Then I uncommented the 'diff_command="vim -d
6 %file1 %file2"' line in /etc/etc-update.conf and I stopped caring.
7
8 I, however, am not sure that distributing an /etc/make.conf is even necessary.
9 Put up an /etc/make.conf.sample instead of make.conf, like some packages do,
10 and let the user look at the sample file and set their own /etc/make.conf.
11
12 Which sounds very similar to what sf@×××××.de (sorry, no names, no signatures
13 there) commented - leave make.conf alone and put the comments in make.globals.
14 That should do the job.
15
16 --
17 \ Georgi Georgiev \ GREAT MOMENTS IN AMERICAN HISTORY (#17): On \
18 / chutz@×××.net / November 13, Felix Unger was asked to remove /
19 \ +81(90)6266-1163 \ himself from his place of residence. \