| 1 |
Roy Marples kirjoitti: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 15:25 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 19:51 Wed 17 Oct , Duncan wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> What about putting it in an fbsd conditional? That way Linux users don't |
| 5 |
>>> have to deal with the step if it's unnecessary for them, while the fbsd |
| 6 |
>>> users still get it when they need it. Seems to me this should be a |
| 7 |
>>> workable compromise, where people might otherwise be inclined to remove |
| 8 |
>>> it. |
| 9 |
>> I prefer to avoid conditionals wherever reasonable, because then you |
| 10 |
>> just have more code paths to test. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> What's more, elibtoolize does more than just fix any FreeBSD issues as |
| 13 |
> it fixes stuff for uclibc and darwin based platforms. It also fixes some |
| 14 |
> old crusty libtools in packages that affect Linux/glibc installs too. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> So just because you don't need it, doesn't mean that someone else |
| 17 |
> doesn't either. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Thanks |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Roy |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
I don't pretend to know much about elibtoolize but if it's so useful why |
| 25 |
it's not needed to always run it? |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Regards, |
| 28 |
Petteri |
Archives