1 |
On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 15:25 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
2 |
> On 19:51 Wed 17 Oct , Duncan wrote: |
3 |
> > What about putting it in an fbsd conditional? That way Linux users don't |
4 |
> > have to deal with the step if it's unnecessary for them, while the fbsd |
5 |
> > users still get it when they need it. Seems to me this should be a |
6 |
> > workable compromise, where people might otherwise be inclined to remove |
7 |
> > it. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> I prefer to avoid conditionals wherever reasonable, because then you |
10 |
> just have more code paths to test. |
11 |
|
12 |
What's more, elibtoolize does more than just fix any FreeBSD issues as |
13 |
it fixes stuff for uclibc and darwin based platforms. It also fixes some |
14 |
old crusty libtools in packages that affect Linux/glibc installs too. |
15 |
|
16 |
So just because you don't need it, doesn't mean that someone else |
17 |
doesn't either. |
18 |
|
19 |
Thanks |
20 |
|
21 |
Roy |
22 |
|
23 |
-- |
24 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |