1 |
Fernando J. Pereda napsal(a): |
2 |
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 07:12:58PM +0100, Jakub Moc wrote: |
3 |
>> Oh well, this apparently doesn't go anywhere, slacking is just |
4 |
>> wonderful, maintainers should just STFU and obey the almighty slacking |
5 |
>> arches, security is the least of a concern and no priority, not |
6 |
>> answering a on bug for half a year makes lots of sense and all is fine |
7 |
>> and dandy. More cruft in the tree for t3h win. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Yeah, we are so slackers that we are able to maintain a whole tree of |
10 |
> keywords with less than 10 persons and less than 10 machines (alpha |
11 |
> example). |
12 |
> |
13 |
> You probably want a shell account on a mips/alpha/... machine so you can |
14 |
> start helping, right? |
15 |
|
16 |
This whole frickin' debate started when vivo mentioned a bug where noone |
17 |
from the concerned arches gave a damn for half a year. Not even uttering |
18 |
a simple "we don't care, punt it" or "we have still an issue with this |
19 |
and are working on it". |
20 |
|
21 |
Then ciaranm came w/ his priorities junk, spb joined to fuel the flame |
22 |
(as always) and then you came horribly offended (for whatever weird |
23 |
reason) about how I'm daring to dictate some arches how they should do |
24 |
their job. |
25 |
|
26 |
OMG how hard is it to post one sentence on such bugs instead of playing |
27 |
a dead horse? Really, stop this nonsense. |
28 |
|
29 |
|
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
Best regards, |
33 |
|
34 |
Jakub Moc |
35 |
mailto:jakub@g.o |
36 |
GPG signature: |
37 |
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E |
38 |
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E |
39 |
|
40 |
... still no signature ;) |