Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Kristian Fiskerstrand <k_f@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Infra plans regarding $Id$ - official answer...
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 12:47:14
Message-Id: 55CDE2D7.60902@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Infra plans regarding $Id$ - official answer... by Andrew Savchenko
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA512
3
4 On 08/14/2015 01:56 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
5
6 ..
7
8 >
9 > 2. The question is why manifests are modified for rsync. In git
10 > manifests are thin (only distfiles are there), in rsync they also
11 > contain checksums for ebuilds and files dir content. Do we really
12 > need this? These manifests are not signed now, so of little use.
13
14 They will be OpenPGP signed by a releng key during thickening and
15 portage will auto-verify it using gkeys once things are in place. As
16 such checksum for ebuilds and other files certainly needs to be part
17 of the manifest, otherwise it can open up for malicious alterations of
18 these files.
19
20 - --
21 Kristian Fiskerstrand
22 Public PGP key 0xE3EDFAE3 at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
23 fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
24 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
25
26 iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJVzeLTAAoJECULev7WN52F9z8H/1Es0XTZP2eBmVyMSfVf65T7
27 MVO2v+0r91kjBekwkmKMNbLM/ZubAq1af20xSUW5Q9kBANJ3GIieU/6CpcVS3BCP
28 bgjSCSOj2cydCgWO3i6eydrB9yEpLVPzi4rezbNVSaLsG3WYEl07z/knXYU5mJJW
29 ViXNeOBPyCDpJiwgccGDmIbFvIghI9bPFOCrLRvmH5v+Velk0QNdK/PZd9pvd792
30 FIyoPcE2hq8NYpeH7o/WWwLcsczERg5HhcAnTmTZYZ0DpLhQzEfHrLlkD46JbR0j
31 JT7rn7PtmtsQNoXTQesmA4hrGLu26fUVljqSbIwJt/33ijis7VSxZVedCp7wGyc=
32 =c5IU
33 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies