| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Or instead of throwing a hissy fit yourself about diego not agreeing |
| 5 |
with you..I don't know you could go and show the way that you feel it |
| 6 |
should be done and show the technical merit. Ciaran I will give you |
| 7 |
that you are a capable programmer, and had valid arguments in this |
| 8 |
thread. However, when interacting with people and proving points on |
| 9 |
merits you seem to go out of your way to not prove anything and throw |
| 10 |
examples out there without really backing them up. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> No, Diego. The argument is that you're coming up with a horrible |
| 13 |
> and unnecessary hack where there are far cleaner alternatives, and |
| 14 |
> that you're blindly sticking to it and trying to throw off any |
| 15 |
> objections by devious means because you don't want to scrap said |
| 16 |
> hack after all the misguided effort you've spent on it. However, |
| 17 |
> since you seem to be incapable of admitting the gaping flaws in |
| 18 |
> your own work, I'm asking for someone else to point this out to you |
| 19 |
> in a formal manner rather than watch this thread go on for even |
| 20 |
> longer. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 24 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) |
| 25 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
iD8DBQFErYFLSENan+PfizARAjzzAJwIue9UDtwsANxaaqqnVJVr0jTz6ACglAL6 |
| 28 |
cO7O0Pw+CGDfFlVdY7z1N3o= |
| 29 |
=6G6V |
| 30 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives