Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "M. J. Everitt" <m.j.everitt@×××.org>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The changes about the stabilization process
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2017 07:11:45
Message-Id: 690dba2a-731f-9bbd-11b1-67a621a198cc@iee.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: The changes about the stabilization process by Michael Palimaka
1 On 04/01/17 07:09, Michael Palimaka wrote:
2 > On 04/01/17 12:57, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
3 >> Hi all,
4 >>
5 >> On Sun, 25 Dec 2016 22:55:27 +0300 Andrew Savchenko wrote:
6 >> [...]
7 >>> Another question: do we steel need to set STABLEREQ keyword for
8 >>> stabilization bugs? Since we now have a dedicated Stabilization
9 >>> component, STABLEREQ looks redundant.
10 >> Ping here.
11 >>
12 >> Best regards,
13 >> Andrew Savchenko
14 >>
15 > With the changes, STABLEREQ and KEYWORDREQ indeed become redundant.
16 >
17 > That said, it's entirely possible some arch team members are relying on
18 > these keywords for old saved searches etc. With so many people working
19 > in isolation, it's difficult to know who is doing what.
20 >
21 If in any doubt .. set *everything* Lol .. you maximise your chances
22 then !! :D

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature