Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Stroller <stroller@××××××××××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: tove <bugs@××××××.net>
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Fwd: Bogofilter - 0.16.0 - Code Clean-up Release - Phase 1
Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2004 16:32:52
Message-Id: 28CFCD42-3D41-11D8-8D3A-000A95795F3E@stellar.eclipse.co.uk
1 Hi all,
2
3 There doesn't seem to be much interest in keeping the Portage tree
4 up-to-date with the current releases of Bogofilter, however development
5 of it is moving quite rapidly & it is at a stage now at which I believe
6 the ebuild *should* be updated, if it is intended to remain in Portage.
7
8 From what I have heard of Spamassasin it uses several methods to detect
9 spam (including blacklists based upon the reports of other users?), and
10 I choose Bogofilter because it's relies purely upon Bayesian analysis
11 of MY spam messages. So I would like to see Bogofilter remain current
12 within Gentoo.
13
14 I have forwarded below an email from Bogofilter's maintainer to the
15 Bogofilter mailing list giving some outlines of why I think an update
16 is needed at present. It's particularly worth noting that the present
17 version of Bogofilter within the tree (0.13.7.3) uses two separate
18 wordlists for spam & ham. Current releases use by default a *single*
19 wordlist of tokens with a pair of spam/ham counts - the separate
20 wordlists are depreciated, and the code will be removed in 0.17.x, so I
21 think Bogofilter-0.16 may be a desirable step to reduce problems during
22 `emerge --update`s in the future.
23
24 If any interested &/or helpful dev could take a look at
25 <http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37017> I would be much
26 indebted. To give you a head-start on the New Year's bug-fixing
27 league-table, I think that if Bogofilter-0.16.0 were to enter the
28 Portage tree, this bug <http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31800>
29 could also be closed.
30
31 Many thanks for your time & bandwidth,
32
33 Stroller.
34
35
36
37 Begin forwarded message:
38
39 > From: David Relson <relson@×××××××××××××.com>
40 > Date: January 1, 2004 10:55:19 pm GMT
41 > To: bogofilter <bogofilter@×××××.com>
42 > Subject: Bogofilter - 0.16.0 - Code Clean-up Release - Phase 1
43 >
44 > Greetings,
45 >
46 > Bogofilter-0.16.0 is the new "current" release. It is officially the
47 > "Code Clean-up Release - Phase 1". Unofficially it's known as the
48 > "deprecated code release".
49 >
50 > The main change is that a lot of old compatibility code is now
51 > bracketed by "#ifdef ENABLE_DEPRECATED_CODE" and "#endif" statements.
52 > By default bogofilter will build with this code disabled. If you need
53 > it, use "configure --enable-deprecated-code".
54 >
55 > A second change is that the binary rpms are now built with BerkeleyDB
56 > 4.1. If you have an older version of BerkeleyDB, you will need to
57 > build
58 > bogofilter from source. Configure option "--with-libdb-prefix={path}"
59 > will likely be needed.
60 >
61 > File RELEASE.NOTES-0.16 has details of the changes. It is recommended
62 > reading!!
63 >
64 > A new file, diff.01513.0160.bz2 has a context diff ("diff -c") between
65 > the previous stable release, bogofilter-0.15.13, and this release.
66 > ...
67 > Happy New Year!
68 >
69 > David
70 >
71 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
72 > FAQ: http://bogofilter.sourceforge.net/bogofilter-faq.html
73 > To unsubscribe, e-mail: bogofilter-unsubscribe@×××××.com
74 > For summary digest subscription: bogofilter-digest-subscribe@×××××.com
75 > For more commands, e-mail: bogofilter-help@×××××.com
76 >
77 >
78
79
80 --
81 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies