1 |
Hi all, |
2 |
|
3 |
There doesn't seem to be much interest in keeping the Portage tree |
4 |
up-to-date with the current releases of Bogofilter, however development |
5 |
of it is moving quite rapidly & it is at a stage now at which I believe |
6 |
the ebuild *should* be updated, if it is intended to remain in Portage. |
7 |
|
8 |
From what I have heard of Spamassasin it uses several methods to detect |
9 |
spam (including blacklists based upon the reports of other users?), and |
10 |
I choose Bogofilter because it's relies purely upon Bayesian analysis |
11 |
of MY spam messages. So I would like to see Bogofilter remain current |
12 |
within Gentoo. |
13 |
|
14 |
I have forwarded below an email from Bogofilter's maintainer to the |
15 |
Bogofilter mailing list giving some outlines of why I think an update |
16 |
is needed at present. It's particularly worth noting that the present |
17 |
version of Bogofilter within the tree (0.13.7.3) uses two separate |
18 |
wordlists for spam & ham. Current releases use by default a *single* |
19 |
wordlist of tokens with a pair of spam/ham counts - the separate |
20 |
wordlists are depreciated, and the code will be removed in 0.17.x, so I |
21 |
think Bogofilter-0.16 may be a desirable step to reduce problems during |
22 |
`emerge --update`s in the future. |
23 |
|
24 |
If any interested &/or helpful dev could take a look at |
25 |
<http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37017> I would be much |
26 |
indebted. To give you a head-start on the New Year's bug-fixing |
27 |
league-table, I think that if Bogofilter-0.16.0 were to enter the |
28 |
Portage tree, this bug <http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31800> |
29 |
could also be closed. |
30 |
|
31 |
Many thanks for your time & bandwidth, |
32 |
|
33 |
Stroller. |
34 |
|
35 |
|
36 |
|
37 |
Begin forwarded message: |
38 |
|
39 |
> From: David Relson <relson@×××××××××××××.com> |
40 |
> Date: January 1, 2004 10:55:19 pm GMT |
41 |
> To: bogofilter <bogofilter@×××××.com> |
42 |
> Subject: Bogofilter - 0.16.0 - Code Clean-up Release - Phase 1 |
43 |
> |
44 |
> Greetings, |
45 |
> |
46 |
> Bogofilter-0.16.0 is the new "current" release. It is officially the |
47 |
> "Code Clean-up Release - Phase 1". Unofficially it's known as the |
48 |
> "deprecated code release". |
49 |
> |
50 |
> The main change is that a lot of old compatibility code is now |
51 |
> bracketed by "#ifdef ENABLE_DEPRECATED_CODE" and "#endif" statements. |
52 |
> By default bogofilter will build with this code disabled. If you need |
53 |
> it, use "configure --enable-deprecated-code". |
54 |
> |
55 |
> A second change is that the binary rpms are now built with BerkeleyDB |
56 |
> 4.1. If you have an older version of BerkeleyDB, you will need to |
57 |
> build |
58 |
> bogofilter from source. Configure option "--with-libdb-prefix={path}" |
59 |
> will likely be needed. |
60 |
> |
61 |
> File RELEASE.NOTES-0.16 has details of the changes. It is recommended |
62 |
> reading!! |
63 |
> |
64 |
> A new file, diff.01513.0160.bz2 has a context diff ("diff -c") between |
65 |
> the previous stable release, bogofilter-0.15.13, and this release. |
66 |
> ... |
67 |
> Happy New Year! |
68 |
> |
69 |
> David |
70 |
> |
71 |
> --------------------------------------------------------------------- |
72 |
> FAQ: http://bogofilter.sourceforge.net/bogofilter-faq.html |
73 |
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: bogofilter-unsubscribe@×××××.com |
74 |
> For summary digest subscription: bogofilter-digest-subscribe@×××××.com |
75 |
> For more commands, e-mail: bogofilter-help@×××××.com |
76 |
> |
77 |
> |
78 |
|
79 |
|
80 |
-- |
81 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |