| 1 |
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 14:38:35 -0400 |
| 3 |
> Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> These errors are not user-visible. I really don't have a problem with |
| 6 |
>> repoman errors for deprecated features. |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> I don't have a problem with always using --force either. But then the |
| 10 |
> distinction between warnings and errors becomes much less clear. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
In general I'd tend to agree, but we're talking about a very limited |
| 14 |
pool of 70 packages, whose maintainers should always be aware of the |
| 15 |
issue, and the number of affected packages should constantly decline. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
If we were talking about something that wasn't on its way out I'd be |
| 18 |
more concerned. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Rich |
Archives