| 1 |
On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 15:15:42 -0400 |
| 2 |
Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o> |
| 5 |
> wrote: |
| 6 |
> > On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 14:38:35 -0400 |
| 7 |
> > Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
| 8 |
> >> |
| 9 |
> >> These errors are not user-visible. I really don't have a problem |
| 10 |
> >> with repoman errors for deprecated features. |
| 11 |
> >> |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > I don't have a problem with always using --force either. But then |
| 14 |
> > the distinction between warnings and errors becomes much less clear. |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> In general I'd tend to agree, but we're talking about a very limited |
| 18 |
> pool of 70 packages, whose maintainers should always be aware of the |
| 19 |
> issue, and the number of affected packages should constantly decline. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> If we were talking about something that wasn't on its way out I'd be |
| 22 |
> more concerned. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
When will it be out? |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
From previous ocaml stabilizations, I'd say that I'll have to use |
| 28 |
--force for at least two months before it can be removed. I might get |
| 29 |
bored and alias --force :) |
Archives