Archives
Archives
| From: | Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] don't rely on dynamic deps | ||
| Date: | Mon, 21 Jul 2014 20:11:26 | ||
| Message-Id: | 53CD72BE.3090607@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] don't rely on dynamic deps by Ciaran McCreesh |
||
| 1 | On 21/07/14 22:50, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 | > On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 22:42:23 +0300 |
| 3 | > Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 | >> people are revbumping packages for the simplest things like EAPI4->5 |
| 5 | > EAPI changing to 5 should always get a revbump, since it causes |
| 6 | > confusion if anyone has a USE dependency upon your package. |
| 7 | > |
| 8 | |
| 9 | What kind of confusion? In my experience, Portage handles it well |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] don't rely on dynamic deps | Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] don't rely on dynamic deps | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> |