| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA256 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 21/07/14 04:06 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> On 21/07/14 22:50, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 7 |
>> On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 22:42:23 +0300 Samuli Suominen |
| 8 |
>> <ssuominen@g.o> wrote: |
| 9 |
>>> people are revbumping packages for the simplest things like |
| 10 |
>>> EAPI4->5 |
| 11 |
>> EAPI changing to 5 should always get a revbump, since it causes |
| 12 |
>> confusion if anyone has a USE dependency upon your package. |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> What kind of confusion? In my experience, Portage handles it |
| 16 |
> well |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Says the guy that's emerging things with --nodeps most of the time... :D |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 23 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
iF4EAREIAAYFAlPNdFUACgkQ2ugaI38ACPAtHgD/YIrBc6LpzTRXm2lxWWSEXkUo |
| 26 |
Wp6IM5mIthE1+0DepsYA/jTG85TGSHF7R326e8eaAlr02FT2g7M47wMjOLzzsvB/ |
| 27 |
=nDEq |
| 28 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives