| 1 |
On 21/07/14 23:13, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 21/07/14 04:06 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> > On 21/07/14 22:50, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 5 |
> >> On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 22:42:23 +0300 Samuli Suominen |
| 6 |
> >> <ssuominen@g.o> wrote: |
| 7 |
> >>> people are revbumping packages for the simplest things like |
| 8 |
> >>> EAPI4->5 |
| 9 |
> >> EAPI changing to 5 should always get a revbump, since it causes |
| 10 |
> >> confusion if anyone has a USE dependency upon your package. |
| 11 |
> >> |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> > What kind of confusion? In my experience, Portage handles it |
| 14 |
> > well |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Says the guy that's emerging things with --nodeps most of the time... :D |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Portage's dependency calculation takes long time, but if you add useless |
| 23 |
rebuilds of packages on top of that, that makes things even worse |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
(Yeah, I saw the ":D") |
Archives