Archives
Archives
| From: | Mike Gilbert <floppymaster@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits | ||
| Date: | Thu, 24 Mar 2011 22:29:19 | ||
| Message-Id: | AANLkTimJAuw1n8U3KyxFSVEwKfpkkWmrvgYgFM-bpB=h@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits by Mike Frysinger |
||
| 1 | On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | > is there any reason we should allow people to commit unsigned |
| 3 | > Manifest's anymore ? generating/posting/enabling a gpg key is |
| 4 | > ridiculously easy and there's really no excuse for a dev to not have |
| 5 | > done this already. |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Is there some plan to make verification of signed Manifests |
| 9 | easy/automatic for end users? Or am I misunderstanding the point of |
| 10 | Manifest signing? |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> |