1 |
On 11/09/2010 04:29 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote: |
2 |
> On Sunday 07 November 2010 16:51:16 Jory A. Pratt wrote: |
3 |
>> As some of you are aware libjpeg-turbo is in the tree, with v8 support. |
4 |
>> We will not keyword for any archs until we officially add the 1.1 |
5 |
>> release that is not avaliable as of yet. If we all use virtual/jpeg we |
6 |
>> can ensure that the user has the right to determine what version of jpeg |
7 |
>> they wish to use. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> do you want all maintainers to run s:media-libs/jpeg:virtual/jpeg: ? |
10 |
> you'll save everyone's time by doing it yourself, |
11 |
|
12 |
Think it more like 'call for extra help', we'll eventually convert |
13 |
everything anyway... |
14 |
but if maintainers (other developers) decide they want to help, it's |
15 |
just a plus and things will go faster |
16 |
|
17 |
> or is there some kind of testing to do before converting ? |
18 |
> |
19 |
> A. |
20 |
> |
21 |
|
22 |
At least compile testing against libjpeg-turbo. Runtime testing is a plus. |