Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "William L. Thomson Jr." <wlt-ml@××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Sets vs Meta ebuilds
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2017 16:32:56
Message-Id: assp.03613587eb.20170707123240.31feb917@o-sinc.com
1 I have been playing with some package sets and I like the concept of
2 sets quite a lot. However there is one big drawback. You cannot use a
3 package set in a profile. Or at least I do not think you can. I have
4 looked into it a bit and does not seem like it is possible.
5
6 I know I can create a meta ebuild and use it like a package set. I
7 think it would be useful to have package sets be able to be used in a
8 profile like meta ebuilds. It would likely reduce the need or use of
9 meta packages. Not sure if there is any benefit to that approach over a
10 set.
11
12 I think sets have benefits over meta packages. This was the most
13 comprehensive document on sets, benefits, uses, etc. Other than the
14 general docs on the wiki.
15 https://makuro.wordpress.com/2010/12/12/intro-to-portage-sets/
16
17 I would really like to be able to use package sets in profiles. I
18 think of use and benefit to others as well.
19
20 --
21 William L. Thomson Jr.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Sets vs Meta ebuilds Lucas Ramage <ramage.lucas94@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Sets vs Meta ebuilds NP-Hardass <NP-Hardass@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Sets vs Meta ebuilds Brian Evans <grknight@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Sets vs Meta ebuilds "William L. Thomson Jr." <wlt-ml@××××××.com>