Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Brian Evans <grknight@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Sets vs Meta ebuilds
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2017 16:57:38
Message-Id: 7513ca72-4ca2-ae77-3321-cdb12263af2f@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Sets vs Meta ebuilds by "William L. Thomson Jr."
1 On 7/7/2017 12:32 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
2
3 > I think sets have benefits over meta packages. This was the most
4 > comprehensive document on sets, benefits, uses, etc. Other than the
5 > general docs on the wiki.
6 > https://makuro.wordpress.com/2010/12/12/intro-to-portage-sets/
7 >
8 > I would really like to be able to use package sets in profiles. I
9 > think of use and benefit to others as well.
10 >
11
12 Beware of sets.. if you put toolchain packages in a set and later do
13 'emerge --unmerge @custom-set' , emerge will happily destroy your toolchain.
14
15 Brian

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Sets vs Meta ebuilds Brian Evans <grknight@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Sets vs Meta ebuilds "William L. Thomson Jr." <wlt-ml@××××××.com>