1 |
On Fri, 7 Jul 2017 12:57:17 -0400 |
2 |
Brian Evans <grknight@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On 7/7/2017 12:32 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: |
5 |
> |
6 |
> > I think sets have benefits over meta packages. This was the most |
7 |
> > comprehensive document on sets, benefits, uses, etc. Other than the |
8 |
> > general docs on the wiki. |
9 |
> > https://makuro.wordpress.com/2010/12/12/intro-to-portage-sets/ |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > I would really like to be able to use package sets in profiles. I |
12 |
> > think of use and benefit to others as well. |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> |
15 |
> Beware of sets.. if you put toolchain packages in a set and later do |
16 |
> 'emerge --unmerge @custom-set' , emerge will happily destroy your |
17 |
> toolchain. |
18 |
|
19 |
That is not much different than removing a system package directly. If |
20 |
you do foolish things you will run into such problems. That would be a |
21 |
self inflicted issue. Likely done out of not knowing what you are doing. |
22 |
|
23 |
Though I will have to see what happens if a package is listed in more |
24 |
than one set. I think there is a hierarchy there. Not to mention if it |
25 |
was removed. I think the world or system set would pull it back in. |
26 |
|
27 |
-- |
28 |
William L. Thomson Jr. |