Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "William L. Thomson Jr." <wlt-ml@××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Sets vs Meta ebuilds
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2017 17:08:05
Message-Id: assp.0361cc31d9.20170707130757.654ad286@o-sinc.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Sets vs Meta ebuilds by Brian Evans
1 On Fri, 7 Jul 2017 12:57:17 -0400
2 Brian Evans <grknight@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > On 7/7/2017 12:32 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
5 >
6 > > I think sets have benefits over meta packages. This was the most
7 > > comprehensive document on sets, benefits, uses, etc. Other than the
8 > > general docs on the wiki.
9 > > https://makuro.wordpress.com/2010/12/12/intro-to-portage-sets/
10 > >
11 > > I would really like to be able to use package sets in profiles. I
12 > > think of use and benefit to others as well.
13 > >
14 >
15 > Beware of sets.. if you put toolchain packages in a set and later do
16 > 'emerge --unmerge @custom-set' , emerge will happily destroy your
17 > toolchain.
18
19 That is not much different than removing a system package directly. If
20 you do foolish things you will run into such problems. That would be a
21 self inflicted issue. Likely done out of not knowing what you are doing.
22
23 Though I will have to see what happens if a package is listed in more
24 than one set. I think there is a hierarchy there. Not to mention if it
25 was removed. I think the world or system set would pull it back in.
26
27 --
28 William L. Thomson Jr.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Sets vs Meta ebuilds Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org>