| 1 |
On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 09:30 +0200, Matthijs van der Vleuten wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 5/17/06, Christian Hartmann <ian@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > > With respect to the "hey support omg!" comments i say stick a big fat |
| 4 |
> > > README about being an experimental profile or something like that and |
| 5 |
> > > that's it. Usually bug reports require "emerge --info" so it'll be easy |
| 6 |
> > > to flag invalid ones anyway. |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > Well. Marking a bug invalid doesn't make the real problem go away... but the |
| 9 |
> > users. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> I'd say that's exactly the intention of INVALID. If I were to file, |
| 12 |
> say, a bug in GCC at Gentoo's Bugzilla instead of GCC's, it would be |
| 13 |
> marked INVALID. (Unless, of course, the bug is caused by Gentoo's |
| 14 |
> patches.) |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
No. It should be marked as UPSTREAM and a bug should be filed in GCC's |
| 17 |
bug tracker or the authors emailed if there's no tracker. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Chris Gianelloni |
| 21 |
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead |
| 22 |
x86 Architecture Team |
| 23 |
Games - Developer |
| 24 |
Gentoo Linux |
Archives