| 1 |
On 13/02/18 20:57, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 3:53 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
| 3 |
> <chithanh@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
>> Dean Stephens schrieb: |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>>>> Suppose that the council decides to accept an appeal from comrel. Is it |
| 7 |
>>>> a conflict of interest for a member of the council who is also a member |
| 8 |
>>>> of comrel to vote in the appeal? If it isn't, it is at least a pretty |
| 9 |
>>>> strong perception that it is. |
| 10 |
>>>> |
| 11 |
>>> Why? How? Exactly what sort of conflicting interest is supposed to be |
| 12 |
>>> present? |
| 13 |
>> I think in Comrel vs. Council is not a conflict of interest, but rather |
| 14 |
>> throwing the appeals process off balance. Can you expect someone to neutrally |
| 15 |
>> review material and actions (question the authenticity of evidence, identify |
| 16 |
>> potential misconduct, etc.) that they themselves used to build the case |
| 17 |
>> against the reprimanded? |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
> I hope that Comrel does not consider it their main duty to build cases |
| 20 |
> against community members. They're supposed to investigate, mediate, |
| 21 |
> and take action if necessary. They aren't prosecutors. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
Do you have evidence either to support or contradict your case? TIA... |
Archives