| 1 |
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 23:34:12 +0100 Peter Ruskin |
| 2 |
<Peter.Ruskin@×××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
| On Thursday 28 October 2004 22:52, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 4 |
| > This is the main problem with -@BLAH... Too frickin' nasty, and only |
| 5 |
| > supported because Kurt thinks we shouldn't protect our users from |
| 6 |
| > doing silly things. I'm inclined to agree... Personally I'm in |
| 7 |
| > favour of sticking in a big fat "DO NOT USE -@BLAH UNLESS YOU REALLY |
| 8 |
| > UNDERSTAND IT" in the docs and leaving it at that... |
| 9 |
| > |
| 10 |
| > | I guess then that dependencies (like X, what I indicated with a |
| 11 |
| > | prefix) should not be part of the groups we define. |
| 12 |
| > |
| 13 |
| > Oooh heck no. That kinda defeats the point, really... |
| 14 |
| |
| 15 |
| I don't understand why you would want X in @KDE or @GNOME - either of |
| 16 |
| them would ensure you get X anyway. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
USE flags != packages. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Fluxbox, Sparc, Mips) |
| 22 |
Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org |
| 23 |
Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm |
Archives