| 1 |
On Thursday 28 October 2004 22:52, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> This is the main problem with -@BLAH... Too frickin' nasty, and only |
| 3 |
> supported because Kurt thinks we shouldn't protect our users from |
| 4 |
> doing silly things. I'm inclined to agree... Personally I'm in favour |
| 5 |
> of sticking in a big fat "DO NOT USE -@BLAH UNLESS YOU REALLY |
| 6 |
> UNDERSTAND IT" in the docs and leaving it at that... |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> | I guess then that dependencies (like X, what I indicated with a |
| 9 |
> | prefix) should not be part of the groups we define. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Oooh heck no. That kinda defeats the point, really... |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I don't understand why you would want X in @KDE or @GNOME - either of |
| 14 |
them would ensure you get X anyway. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Peter |
| 18 |
======================================================================== |
| 19 |
Gentoo Linux: Portage 2.0.51-r2. kernel-2.6.8-gentoo-r10. |
| 20 |
i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 3200+. gcc(GCC): 3.3.4. |
| 21 |
KDE: 3.3.1. Qt: 3.3.3. |
| 22 |
======================================================================== |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives