Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Georgi Georgiev <chutz@×××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 29 (USE Flag Grouping) with -@GROUP goodness
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 22:39:56
Message-Id: 20041028223952.GB6484@lion.gg3.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 29 (USE Flag Grouping) with -@GROUP goodness by Peter Ruskin
1 maillog: 28/10/2004-23:34:12(+0100): Peter Ruskin types
2 > On Thursday 28 October 2004 22:52, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
3 > > This is the main problem with -@BLAH... Too frickin' nasty, and only
4 > > supported because Kurt thinks we shouldn't protect our users from
5 > > doing silly things. I'm inclined to agree... Personally I'm in favour
6 > > of sticking in a big fat "DO NOT USE -@BLAH UNLESS YOU REALLY
7 > > UNDERSTAND IT" in the docs and leaving it at that...
8 > >
9 > > | I guess then that dependencies (like X, what I indicated with a
10 > > | prefix) should not be part of the groups we define.
11 > >
12 > > Oooh heck no. That kinda defeats the point, really...
13 >
14 > I don't understand why you would want X in @KDE or @GNOME - either of
15 > them would ensure you get X anyway.
16
17 Because if I do "USE=@GNOME" I'd expect an "emerge gnuplot" to pull in X
18 and install with X support (in other words, to have USE=X).
19
20 --
21 \ Georgi Georgiev \ Established technology tends to persist in \
22 / chutz@×××.net / the face of new technology. -- G. Blaauw, /
23 \ +81(90)6266-1163 \ one of the designers of System 360 \
24
25 --
26 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list