1 |
maillog: 28/10/2004-23:34:12(+0100): Peter Ruskin types |
2 |
> On Thursday 28 October 2004 22:52, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
3 |
> > This is the main problem with -@BLAH... Too frickin' nasty, and only |
4 |
> > supported because Kurt thinks we shouldn't protect our users from |
5 |
> > doing silly things. I'm inclined to agree... Personally I'm in favour |
6 |
> > of sticking in a big fat "DO NOT USE -@BLAH UNLESS YOU REALLY |
7 |
> > UNDERSTAND IT" in the docs and leaving it at that... |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > | I guess then that dependencies (like X, what I indicated with a |
10 |
> > | prefix) should not be part of the groups we define. |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > Oooh heck no. That kinda defeats the point, really... |
13 |
> |
14 |
> I don't understand why you would want X in @KDE or @GNOME - either of |
15 |
> them would ensure you get X anyway. |
16 |
|
17 |
Because if I do "USE=@GNOME" I'd expect an "emerge gnuplot" to pull in X |
18 |
and install with X support (in other words, to have USE=X). |
19 |
|
20 |
-- |
21 |
\ Georgi Georgiev \ Established technology tends to persist in \ |
22 |
/ chutz@×××.net / the face of new technology. -- G. Blaauw, / |
23 |
\ +81(90)6266-1163 \ one of the designers of System 360 \ |
24 |
|
25 |
-- |
26 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |