| 1 |
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 23:32:03 +0200 Maurice van der Pot |
| 2 |
<griffon26@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
| > | So what would you do with @KDE -@GNOME? |
| 4 |
| > |
| 5 |
| > The obvious solution is to not stick -kde -qt in the GNOME group. |
| 6 |
| > Using GNOME doesn't imply that you're not going to use KDE. |
| 7 |
| |
| 8 |
| Of course. That's not what I meant. I was talking about the X that |
| 9 |
| could be in KDE and in GNOME. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Oh. Uhm, yeah, that one... Welllllll... Currently if you do USE="X blah |
| 12 |
-X", you get -X. So it's still gonna be the same here. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
This is the main problem with -@BLAH... Too frickin' nasty, and only |
| 15 |
supported because Kurt thinks we shouldn't protect our users from doing |
| 16 |
silly things. I'm inclined to agree... Personally I'm in favour of |
| 17 |
sticking in a big fat "DO NOT USE -@BLAH UNLESS YOU REALLY UNDERSTAND |
| 18 |
IT" in the docs and leaving it at that... |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
| I guess then that dependencies (like X, what I indicated with a |
| 21 |
| prefix) should not be part of the groups we define. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Oooh heck no. That kinda defeats the point, really... |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Fluxbox, Sparc, Mips) |
| 27 |
Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org |
| 28 |
Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm |
Archives