| 1 |
On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 10:22:59PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 23:19:24 +0200 Maurice van der Pot |
| 3 |
> <griffon26@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> | On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 10:53:14PM +0200, Paul de Vrieze wrote: |
| 5 |
> | > What I think is the best solution is to allow negation of groups |
| 6 |
> | > only under certain conditions. One condition is that the group may |
| 7 |
> | > not contain negations |
| 8 |
> | |
| 9 |
> | So what would you do with @KDE -@GNOME? |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> The obvious solution is to not stick -kde -qt in the GNOME group. Using |
| 12 |
> GNOME doesn't imply that you're not going to use KDE. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Of course. That's not what I meant. I was talking about the X that could |
| 15 |
be in KDE and in GNOME. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I guess then that dependencies (like X, what I indicated with a prefix) |
| 18 |
should not be part of the groups we define. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Maurice. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Maurice van der Pot |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Gentoo Linux Developer griffon26@g.o http://www.gentoo.org |
| 26 |
Creator of BiteMe! griffon26@××××××××.com http://www.kfk4ever.com |
Archives