| 1 |
El mié, 06-11-2013 a las 18:20 +0100, Michał Górny escribió: |
| 2 |
> Dnia 2013-11-06, o godz. 18:14:57 |
| 3 |
> Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o> napisał(a): |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
> > > Please review the following news item. I would prefer committing it |
| 7 |
> > > as soon as I get an ACK from all the relevant parties since the issue |
| 8 |
> > > is hitting users pretty hard. |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > LGTM. |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > I have two questions that should not block this news item from going live: |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > - I tend to upgrade with emerge -uavD --changed-use world, and this |
| 15 |
> > didn't solve the blocker for me by itself. I had to emerge -C |
| 16 |
> > python-exec, then run the upgrade to get it to work. Yet the news item |
| 17 |
> > seems to state that -uD should have been enough. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Well, I have no idea why this happens for some people. Unless you were |
| 20 |
> playing with keywords, it simply should work. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> > - How come we did not think this news item was necessary before we did |
| 23 |
> > the package move? Obviously everything would have been better had this |
| 24 |
> > news item gone out with the package move, instead of one week later. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> I think we focused on my little testing that showed that portage can |
| 27 |
> handle blockers with '-uD' and assumed users will be able to understand |
| 28 |
> the blocker message. |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
I have also had strange blockers, maybe due python-3.3 (but I have |
| 32 |
unmasked it properly I think :/). I only could resolve it by installing: |
| 33 |
dev-lang/python-exec-0.9999 |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
I don't understand why 0.3.1 isn't enough :( |
Archives