| 1 |
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> I hope somebody not Libav nor FFmpeg committer could come up with a |
| 3 |
> pros-cons list. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
++, but frankly the committers are probably in the best place to do |
| 6 |
any evaluation even if they likely have some bias. If you wanted to |
| 7 |
delve into the merits of portage vs paludis you'd be far more informed |
| 8 |
by a discussion between the respective devs (even if flames are |
| 9 |
involved) than listening to some Ubuntu users go on about which ones |
| 10 |
were the ricers. Keeping things civil of course is desirable all the |
| 11 |
same. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
A wiki page might be a good place for this. Perhaps we should have |
| 14 |
some category for point-in-time analyses/evaluations/etc when things |
| 15 |
like this come up. A page like this might be something that gets |
| 16 |
attention from the linux community in general. If we want it to be |
| 17 |
anything other than a raging flamewar it might require moderation, and |
| 18 |
a lot of sticking to the facts and looking at it pragmatically from a |
| 19 |
"what makes sense for a distro" standpoint rather than "which is the |
| 20 |
better project" standpoint. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Rich |
Archives