| 1 |
On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 21:11:22 +0200 |
| 2 |
Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 19:52:05 +0100 |
| 4 |
> Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 20:46:48 +0200 |
| 6 |
> > Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 7 |
> > > Now, let me remind you because you probably fail to know the world |
| 8 |
> > > outside your dreamworld: |
| 9 |
> > > |
| 10 |
> > > (with HDEPEND/DEPEND) generally mean that we would need to |
| 11 |
> > > s/DEPEND/HDEPEND/ for the vast majority of ebuilds (ie all the |
| 12 |
> > > trivial ones)? |
| 13 |
> > > |
| 14 |
> > > That does effectively refer to the common depends as well. You |
| 15 |
> > > know, in the real world where there is no magical variables which |
| 16 |
> > > do miracles behind your back. |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> > Uhm, no, it doesn't. Things in both DEPEND and RDEPEND are an |
| 19 |
> > *entirely* different case when it comes to destinations, since |
| 20 |
> > RDEPEND goes to ROOT. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> And? RDEPEND isn't required to be merged before building the package. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
I repeat: "things in both DEPEND and RDEPEND". |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
I also repeat: HDEPEND is relevant only to things that are in DEPEND |
| 27 |
and not RDEPEND. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives