| 1 |
On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 19:52:05 +0100 |
| 2 |
Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 20:46:48 +0200 |
| 5 |
> Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
> > Now, let me remind you because you probably fail to know the world |
| 7 |
> > outside your dreamworld: |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > (with HDEPEND/DEPEND) generally mean that we would need to |
| 10 |
> > s/DEPEND/HDEPEND/ for the vast majority of ebuilds (ie all the |
| 11 |
> > trivial ones)? |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > That does effectively refer to the common depends as well. You know, |
| 14 |
> > in the real world where there is no magical variables which do |
| 15 |
> > miracles behind your back. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Uhm, no, it doesn't. Things in both DEPEND and RDEPEND are an |
| 18 |
> *entirely* different case when it comes to destinations, since RDEPEND |
| 19 |
> goes to ROOT. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
And? RDEPEND isn't required to be merged before building the package. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Best regards, |
| 25 |
Michał Górny |
Archives