1 |
Dnia 2014-07-27, o godz. 16:05:34 |
2 |
""Paweł Hajdan, Jr."" <phajdan.jr@g.o> napisał(a): |
3 |
|
4 |
> On 7/21/14, 11:52 PM, Alexander Berntsen wrote: |
5 |
> > Michał has documented the shortcomings of dynamic deps in our wiki[0]. |
6 |
> > (Thank you!) [...] |
7 |
> > [0] <https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Portage/Dynamic_dependencies> |
8 |
> |
9 |
> There's one more thing I'd like to ask about: |
10 |
> |
11 |
> For "Minor linking change w/ dependency change (unnecessary linking |
12 |
> removed)" the "dynamic deps" cell is red with "revbump + mostly |
13 |
> unnecessary rebuild", and "static deps" says "applied after rebuild". |
14 |
> |
15 |
> Arguably with dynamic deps one could also skip the revbump, and the |
16 |
> update would similarly be applied after rebuild. |
17 |
|
18 |
No, the update would be applied immediately. In other words, emerge |
19 |
will remove the dependency and allow it to be depcleaned even though |
20 |
the package still links to it. You need to revbump to avoid the broken |
21 |
linkage. |
22 |
|
23 |
|
24 |
-- |
25 |
Best regards, |
26 |
Michał Górny |