Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: foser <foser@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal: sys-pam category
Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2005 16:43:35
Message-Id: 1117989777.13069.4.camel@rivendell
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal: sys-pam category by Jonas Geiregat
1 On Sun, 2005-06-05 at 18:34 +0200, Jonas Geiregat wrote:
2 > I do agree with you but some package just have completely wrong place
3 > within portage, such package placements migh confuse the user.
4 > To give an example: mzscheme was placed in dev-lisp while portage had a
5 > dev-scheme directory.
6
7 The current set-up isn't user-browseable anyway and hasn't been for a
8 long time. I don't think the focus should be on correcting that in the
9 tree, the user tools should be improved really.
10
11 - foser

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal: sys-pam category "Nathan L. Adams" <nadams@××××.org>