| 1 |
On 20 January 2013 06:59, Francesco Riosa <vivo75@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> 2013/1/19 Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> |
| 3 |
>> Just a completely different idea -- how about putting those libraries |
| 4 |
>> into different categories appropriate to the topic? We have a bunch of |
| 5 |
>> categories like dev-libs, media-libs, etc. -- and I wonder how many of |
| 6 |
>> the Qt libs would fit into each of them. |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
> This would be the right thing to do, or the correct way. |
| 9 |
> Most would really hate it (me too) |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Only for certain values of right and correct. Your gut reaction shows |
| 12 |
there are other ways to look at it. Besides, do you really want to |
| 13 |
spread the modules that are distributed in the same tarball into |
| 14 |
different categories? And then how about updating, something |
| 15 |
equivalent to: emerge -au1 `eix --only-names -IC qt` (or dev-qt, or |
| 16 |
whatever the single category will be)? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Cheers, |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Ben | yngwin |
| 22 |
Gentoo developer |
| 23 |
Gentoo Qt project lead, Gentoo Wiki admin |
Archives