| 1 |
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 01:51:39PM -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote: |
| 2 |
> I just had somebody ask me about whether or not we still needed LDAP |
| 3 |
> help. It's a good question, and I didn't know the answer, which is |
| 4 |
> rather embarrassing since I'm the one who filed the LDAP staffing |
| 5 |
> request. Since then I believe that lcars had taken LDAP over, or is |
| 6 |
> otherwise assisting robbat2 (or the LDAP team, if we have one now). |
| 7 |
I wouldn't call us a full team, just a small group of folk that have a mail |
| 8 |
alias (ldap-bugs), and try to handle bugs for LDAP. [robbat2, jokey, strerror]. |
| 9 |
I agree the LDAP docs need to be re-written, but that's a large undertaking. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> In any event, I doubt that I'm the only irresponsible dev who's added |
| 12 |
> an entry to the staffing-needs page and forgot about it, so perhaps |
| 13 |
> we need to have items expire unless explicitly renewed? Thoughts? |
| 14 |
I'm in favour of having expiry dates for requests yes. |
| 15 |
And somebody can change my request for app-backup staff down a priority level |
| 16 |
thanks. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Robin Hugh Johnson |
| 20 |
E-Mail : robbat2@g.o |
| 21 |
GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85 |
Archives