Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC Package name additions
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 09:37:08
Message-Id: 45FBB5B5.1060006@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC Package name additions by "Miroslav Šulc (fordfrog)"
1 Miroslav Šulc (fordfrog) napsal(a):
2 > According to
3 > http://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/file-format/index.html#file-naming-rules
4 > it seems to me the versioning is focused on package stability life
5 > cycle. In netbeans case it is _prealpha and definitely not stable
6 > patched release. So _alpha is the closest one to current netbeans 6.0
7 > life cycle phase, though not accurate.
8
9 Actually stuff like cat/pkg-1.2_alpha3_pre4 is valid now and honored by
10 portage; dunno how does that fit the netbeans upstream scheme, though.
11
12
13 --
14 Best regards,
15
16 Jakub Moc
17 mailto:jakub@g.o
18 GPG signature:
19 http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
20 Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E
21
22 ... still no signature ;)

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC Package name additions "Miroslav Šulc (fordfrog)" <fordfrog@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC Package name additions Carsten Lohrke <carlo@g.o>