From: | Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC Package name additions | ||
Date: | Sat, 17 Mar 2007 09:37:08 | ||
Message-Id: | 45FBB5B5.1060006@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC Package name additions by "Miroslav Šulc (fordfrog)" |
1 | Miroslav Šulc (fordfrog) napsal(a): |
2 | > According to |
3 | > http://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/file-format/index.html#file-naming-rules |
4 | > it seems to me the versioning is focused on package stability life |
5 | > cycle. In netbeans case it is _prealpha and definitely not stable |
6 | > patched release. So _alpha is the closest one to current netbeans 6.0 |
7 | > life cycle phase, though not accurate. |
8 | |
9 | Actually stuff like cat/pkg-1.2_alpha3_pre4 is valid now and honored by |
10 | portage; dunno how does that fit the netbeans upstream scheme, though. |
11 | |
12 | |
13 | -- |
14 | Best regards, |
15 | |
16 | Jakub Moc |
17 | mailto:jakub@g.o |
18 | GPG signature: |
19 | http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E |
20 | Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E |
21 | |
22 | ... still no signature ;) |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC Package name additions | "Miroslav Šulc (fordfrog)" <fordfrog@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC Package name additions | Carsten Lohrke <carlo@g.o> |