| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Jakub Moc napsal(a): |
| 5 |
> Miroslav ©ulc (fordfrog) napsal(a): |
| 6 |
>> According to |
| 7 |
>> http://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/file-format/index.html#file-naming-rules |
| 8 |
>> it seems to me the versioning is focused on package stability life |
| 9 |
>> cycle. In netbeans case it is _prealpha and definitely not stable |
| 10 |
>> patched release. So _alpha is the closest one to current netbeans 6.0 |
| 11 |
>> life cycle phase, though not accurate. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Actually stuff like cat/pkg-1.2_alpha3_pre4 is valid now and honored by |
| 14 |
> portage; dunno how does that fit the netbeans upstream scheme, though. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Where does this come from? There is nothing about it in devmanual. And |
| 18 |
is '_alpha > _alpha_pre' true of false? Anyway I'd rather preffer |
| 19 |
_prealpha than _alpha_pre :-) |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
- -- |
| 23 |
Miroslav ©ulc (fordfrog) |
| 24 |
Gentoo/Java Team |
| 25 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 26 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (GNU/Linux) |
| 27 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
iD8DBQFF+9m2RSzWCmqu+0YRAt+3AJ9RcqsIgCzlJCygKyRrqEGZY6lmogCffLWl |
| 30 |
ZdCUglDhgQAiBaop7G1dXM4= |
| 31 |
=14Rp |
| 32 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives