Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò" <flameeyes@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal: sys-pam category
Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2005 17:39:25
Message-Id: 200506051934.37053@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal: sys-pam category by Ned Ludd
1 On Sunday 05 June 2005 17:37, Ned Ludd wrote:
2 > I think they are fine where they are. Moving stuff around is a waste of
3 > time. Makes things more complex. Makes more work on everybody.
4 Sorry but I don't agree with that, at least for the particular case of pam.
5 The way it's now, makes my work hardware than it could be having them in
6 order. If I want to look for pam modules which needs to be fixed, I need to
7 go through a list with eix looking for them. Also two similar modules like
8 pam_ssh and pam_ssh_agent are respectively in app-crypt and sys-libs.
9 And sorry, I don't think that everytime I need to find out what I need to
10 change or test I need to do some strange query like "eix -r [^s]\?pam -o
11 ^pam".
12
13 --
14 Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò
15 Gentoo Developer (Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, Gentoo/AMD64)
16
17 http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal: sys-pam category Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>