Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Developer retirement
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 19:40:32
Message-Id: 4533DEEC.1050300@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Developer retirement by Donnie Berkholz
1 Donnie Berkholz napsal(a):
2 > Jakub Moc wrote:
3 >> I don't see what's there to fix, already told that the behaviour is
4 >> damned inconsistent with all other mailing lists. Fix the mailing list,
5 >> ktnxbye, don't have time for such nonsense.
6 >
7 > Why don't you use Reply All or Reply to List, like everyone else?
8
9 Yes, that's a wonderful and popular "workaround" that makes me recieve
10 half of the replies on that list multiple times, because I'm apparently
11 not the only only having the problem with the stupid behaviour. Wouldn't
12 it make sense to finally fix it instead of wasting bandwidth and pissing
13 off developers for no apparent reason?
14
15 TIA.
16
17
18 --
19 Best regards,
20
21 Jakub Moc
22 mailto:jakub@g.o
23 GPG signature:
24 http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
25 Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E
26
27 ... still no signature ;)

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Developer retirement Wernfried Haas <amne@g.o>