Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X porting: dependency changes
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 08:16:31
Message-Id: 438EB0C6.2000405@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X porting: dependency changes by Lina Pezzella
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Lina Pezzella wrote:
5 | I would want to know exactly how many keywords would be dropped with
6 | this solution. I would hate to see something that is working perfectly
7 | fine having support dropped due to syntax troubles in an ebuild...
8
9 Portage's lack of sanity checks is completely unrelated to syntax troubles.
10
11 As far as progress on this issue, we're looking into adopting glep 37
12 and creating a virtual/x11 ebuild to address this.
13
14 Thanks,
15 Donnie
16 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
17 Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
18
19 iD8DBQFDjrDGXVaO67S1rtsRAg6KAKC6JnjB8FFilBiDqoIanbtEueYInwCdH08t
20 pUwf5CGiYrFd0v56Q2pZK9E=
21 =BSLt
22 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
23 --
24 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Modular X porting: dependency changes Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o>