1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
|
5 |
On Nov 22, 2005, at 4:13 AM, Grobian wrote: |
6 |
|
7 |
> On 21-11-2005 19:15:58 -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
8 |
>> | virtual/x11 isn't xorg for all profiles. |
9 |
>> |
10 |
>> Perhaps the relevant people (macos?) could get in touch with me, |
11 |
>> and we |
12 |
>> can figure out what needs to happen. |
13 |
>> |
14 |
>> It may be that we'll need to add x11-base/apple-xfree into the || |
15 |
>> list |
16 |
>> as well. Using the virtual is not an option right now, because of the |
17 |
>> previously mentioned bug. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> OSX doesn't have Xorg (yet?), so it would indeed cause some trouble |
20 |
> for |
21 |
> us right now. Since we're outnumbered here, I'd vote to make the |
22 |
> change that is compatible with the majority of users right now. I'm |
23 |
> affraid it would just boil down to dropping the ppc-macos keyword on |
24 |
> those packages that get xorg dependency. The mentioned || list is an |
25 |
> issue for more than xorg, so it should be considered some more IMHO. |
26 |
> Kito, can you agree with this, or do you have another 'solution'? |
27 |
|
28 |
I would want to know exactly how many keywords would be dropped with |
29 |
this solution. I would hate to see something that is working |
30 |
perfectly fine having support dropped due to syntax troubles in an |
31 |
ebuild... |
32 |
|
33 |
- --Lina Pezzella |
34 |
Gentoo Developer |
35 |
|
36 |
|
37 |
|
38 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
39 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (Darwin) |
40 |
|
41 |
iD8DBQFDjmXGNJ9STR9DbYERAtx6AJ4qQG3fr80C5IAf9rxsMfSYFvuc0wCdEe5w |
42 |
ca4WsabWZGsVEjmBrh2EcPE= |
43 |
=wyJn |
44 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
45 |
-- |
46 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |